|
Post by Booker Thee on Nov 18, 2004 17:54:59 GMT -5
So RME is doing a Best of Three Series. Hmmm...those guys try to rip us off far too often. It's kinda flattering, but send me a PO instead.
What a sad, sad shell RME has become.
|
|
|
Post by Skinartia on Nov 18, 2004 19:09:55 GMT -5
Sad shell of what?
|
|
|
Post by Korigath on Nov 18, 2004 21:01:04 GMT -5
Saying that they ripped off the best of three from you, is like saying you ripped off the Cena/Booker series, but yours is three instead.
"Best ofs" have been done for a long time, it's certainly not original anymore.
But anyways, off to check out the show!
|
|
|
Post by Pintsize80 on Nov 19, 2004 3:03:58 GMT -5
back to the topic at hand...what the original thread topic was about d**n it!!!!
This past ringmasters show.
Let me just say that never NEVER ever again will I spend money to watch one, even if I got in for free would I watch one.
|
|
|
Post by Pintsize80 on Nov 19, 2004 3:04:27 GMT -5
whew! haha...I posted that last reply in the right thread.
|
|
|
Post by Skinartia on Nov 19, 2004 7:31:48 GMT -5
I concur.
After that show, I had told everyone I know to never waste their money on that product.
|
|
|
Post by Booker Thee on Nov 19, 2004 12:21:23 GMT -5
I would normally agree with you, but that is the fifth time this year that they have made a big deal about doing something that we did a week or two earlier. I have no doubts that their decision to do a Best Of series at the top of the card is because we made a big deal out of doing it. I guess the difference is, they don't have the confidence in their guys to do it over a best of seven series. Then again, Gene Swan is no Rawskillz and Mo Luke (as much as I like him) is no Mentallo.
|
|
|
Post by Korigath on Nov 20, 2004 1:13:01 GMT -5
So you unveiled a new "stable", didn't RME just do that recently as well?
The same argument can be used here that you stole that idea. Now doesn't that make you even?
|
|